Planning time in primary schools: APT, RFF, NCT, DOTT and NIT.

Australian primary teachers are entitled to timetabled release from face-to-face teaching each week for planning, preparation and assessment. The entitlement is set by industrial agreement, and teachers know exactly what they are owed.

What it is called depends on where you are. Victoria says APT. New South Wales says RFF (relief from face-to-face teaching). Queensland and the Northern Territory say NCT (non-contact time). Western Australia and Tasmania say DOTT (duties other than teaching). South Australia says NIT (non-instruction time). The ACT calls it release time.

The weekly minutes are set by each state or territory's current industrial agreement or award, and they change when agreements are renegotiated. Several states have increased primary release time in recent rounds. Do not timetable from memory or from last year's figure. Check the current agreement, because delivering the old minutes under the new rules is a grievance waiting to happen.

Part-time teachers receive a pro-rata entitlement, and this is where most schools get into trouble. The arithmetic is easy; the delivery is not, because a 0.6 teacher can only receive release on the days they work. A timetable can supply the school's total release minutes perfectly while still short-changing particular people.

Job-share classes add a second layer. Each partner has their own pro-rata entitlement, deliverable only on their own days, while the class still needs its full specialist program. Treating a job-share class as one teacher is the usual reason one partner receives no release at all.

Release time has a property no other timetable rule has: it is tied to coverage. A meeting uses a teacher's time. Release time uses a teacher's time and also requires another adult to be teaching their class for that exact period. Every minute of entitlement you owe is a minute of someone else's teaching you must schedule.

In practice, most primary schools deliver release through the specialist program. While the Art teacher has 3B, 3B's classroom teacher is released. That makes the specialist timetable and the release record the same thing: move a specialist session and you have silently moved someone's planning time, possibly onto a day they do not work.

This is why release time breaks spreadsheets. Every change (a specialist absence, a swapped session, a new part-time arrangement) re-asks the question "does every teacher still get their minutes?", and the spreadsheet does not answer.

Blocked release beats scattered release. Forty minutes here and thirty there meets the agreement and is close to useless in practice, because real planning needs unbroken time. Where your agreement and program allow, schedule release in meaningful blocks, and ask teachers whether they prefer sessions back-to-back or spread out.

Team planning is worth designing for. If a year level's classes all go to specialists in the same window, that team can plan together. It costs nothing extra in specialist hours; it only requires arranging the rotation deliberately.

Avoid stacking three release sessions on one day unless the teacher has asked for it. It gives them a day with almost no teaching and starves the rest of their week, and a single absence on that day wipes out their whole entitlement at once. Spreading release across the week is more resilient and usually fairer.

The entitlement is weekly, so delivery is weekly, and interruptions are constant. A specialist is absent and their sessions disappear. Camp takes half the staff. A wet-day timetable scrambles the afternoon. Each event can silently delete someone's release.

Schools that stay out of trouble keep a record: what was owed, what was delivered, what was missed, and what happens next under your agreement, which may be made-up release, time in lieu, or nothing owed at all.

Whatever tracks the timetable should track this record. If your timetable tool cannot tell you, per teacher, whether this week's entitlement was met after the Tuesday reshuffle, then someone is keeping that answer by hand.

Bell Path treats release time as a hard rule, in your state's language, unless the school has recorded a staff agreement for a lower figure for a particular teacher. You set each teacher's entitlement (pro-rata is handled for part-timers and job-shares), and the timetable generator builds the specialist program and the release schedule together, so coverage is built in. Before the timetable goes to staff, Final Check shows delivery per teacher to the minute and lists any shortfall as something to fix.

Once staff are working from the timetable, the same record keeps running. Absences, cover and swaps update the picture, and time in lieu is visible. When the agreement changes, you change the entitlement once and regenerate.