Comparison
Bell Path vs FET
Choose Bell Path when leadership time is what you are short of, and you want Australian planning time, daily cover and yard duty handled. Choose FET when there is no budget and someone technical will own it.
FET is free, open source, capable and actively maintained, with a new version out on 2 October 2026. If there is no budget, it deserves a serious look. This page is about what the zero price does and does not cover for an Australian primary school.
Already run one? Send the file and it is in Bell Path within 48 hours, with Daily Cover free for two weeks.
FET is written by two named developers, Liviu Lalescu and Volker Dirr, and released under the GNU Affero General Public License, an open-source licence. Its features are assessed from its public documentation and forum.
Sources checked · 3 October 2026
Which product fits which school.
Choose Bell Path if
- You are short of leadership hours, not software budget
- You need Australian planning time enforced rather than modelled by hand
- You want daily cover, yard duty, wet day plans and events as well as the timetable
- You need someone to answer when it will not build and you cannot work out why
Choose FET if
- Your school cannot fund software this year. FET is free forever and that matters more than any feature list
- You have a staff member who enjoys this kind of problem and will own it properly
- You want full control over every rule, including rules no commercial product lets you set
- You are comfortable with a desktop program, manual data entry and help from a forum rather than a support team
What the decision usually comes down to.
Price
Published annual pricing, $679 a year for up to 100 students and $1,349 for 101 to 300, rising with school size, with no GST added
Free, permanently, under an open-source licence
Real cost
Setup a school leader can finish in about an hour at a small school, longer at a large one
Setup measured in days, plus one person being the only one who understands it
Australian context
State planning-time rules, state vocabulary, yard duty, wet day and relief arrangements
None. You model every Australian rule yourself as a general constraint
When it will not build
Names the teacher, the rule and the fix, and will not build while a Must fix finding stands
Reports that no solution exists. Working out why is your job, with help from community forums
After the timetable
Daily cover, yard duty with a fairness record, wet day plans, event timetables, an operations calendar and a staff portal
FET itself builds timetables and stops there. Its co-author sells TiTiTo, a separate paid tool for substitution and supervision planning
Support
Email support and a walkthrough on request
A forum where the developers answer most days, documentation, and paid custom versions. Nobody is obliged to answer
FAQ
Questions schools ask when comparing Bell Path and FET.
Is FET really free?
Yes, completely: no licence cost and no trial limit. It is released under the GNU Affero General Public License. That is a real option for a school with no software budget, and we would rather a school used FET than went back to a spreadsheet.
What does FET not do for an Australian primary school?
It has no concept of Australian planning time, no state vocabulary, no yard duty or wet day supervision, no daily cover, and no support team. Every local rule has to be expressed by you as a general constraint, and any mistake in that translation produces a timetable that looks right and is not.
How long does FET take to set up compared with Bell Path?
Realistically several days for someone learning FET, against about an hour of setup in Bell Path for a small school, longer for a large one. With FET you describe the school in a general constraint language rather than answering questions about a primary school. Whether that trade is worth it depends on whose hours are scarcer at your school.
Can we start with FET and move later?
You can, and some schools do. What transfers is the thinking: knowing your real rules, your entitlements and your specialist rotation. The setup itself will not transfer, because the two products describe a school in different terms.
Other comparisons.
Bell Path vs aSc Timetables
Choose aSc when a low one-off price, an unlimited trial or a desktop program matters more than Australian primary-school rules.
Bell Path vs the spreadsheet
Keep the spreadsheet while your week rarely changes and checking it by eye is still manageable.
Bell Path vs Prime Timetable
Choose Prime Timetable for a light, general scheduler that runs on any device and is quick to start.
Bell Path vs TimeTabler
Choose TimeTabler if you are a secondary school, or you want to learn the craft of timetabling itself.
See the timetable before you decide.
Send us the timetable you already run and it is in Bell Path within 48 hours, or see a week Bell Path built for a sample school first.
Bell Path publishes its prices: $679 a year for up to 100 students and $1,349 for 101 to 300, rising with school size, with no per-user add-ons. See the full price list.


