Skip to main content

Comparison

Bell Path vs DayGrid

Bell Path and DayGrid are both built for Australian primary schools, but they solve different-shaped problems. DayGrid combines specialist timetables, yard-duty rosters, and class creation. Bell Path uses the timetable as the spine for daily cover, duty, wet-day, event planning, and staff review while keeping student names out of core timetabling.

This comparison is based on Bell Path and DayGrid public product and pricing pages as reviewed on July 10, 2026. Product capabilities, pricing, hosting, and support can change — verify current details with each provider.

Tell us what you want to see and a preferred after-school time. We will confirm by email.

Two honest answers

Which product fits which school.

Choose Bell Path if

You want a workflow built for Australian primary schools.

  • The timetable is the start of the job: daily cover, wet-day plans, event timetables, operations calendar, and staff review also need one home
  • You want core timetabling to work without student names or a whole-school student import
  • APT/RFF/NCT/DOTT/NIT, part-time staff, job-shares, specialist rotations, and pre-publish proof are the hard part of your week
  • Your leadership team wants to set up and run the workflow itself, with published pricing and printable school-approval material

Choose DayGrid if

DayGrid is a better contextual fit.

  • Class creation is as important as timetabling, including student, teacher, friendship, academic, social, or behavioural inputs
  • Australian data hosting is a non-negotiable procurement requirement today
  • You want a free, limited-capacity evaluation before moving to full-school access
  • A dedicated account manager, business-hours phone support, and a guided setup session are central to your buying decision

Side-by-side

What the decision usually comes down to.

Decision area
Bell Path
DayGrid

Core scope

Specialist timetabling plus daily cover, yard duty, wet-day plans, event timetables, operations calendar, Education Support, and a staff portal

Specialist timetables, yard-duty rosters, and class creation in one primary-school platform

Student data

Core timetabling does not need student names; named records are limited to optional workflows such as Education Support

Class creation publicly includes student imports and collection of student friendship input through an online portal

After the timetable

The published timetable feeds same-morning cover, duty, wet-day response, events, staff views, and operational handovers

Public positioning centres on timetable, yard-duty, and class-list generation, refinement, analytics, and export

Evaluation and pricing

School setup and the public sample are available before purchase; generation is payment-gated. Founding-school and standard pricing are published

Always-free access with limited student, teacher, and class capacity; full-school access publicly starts from $1,495 per year

Data residency

Australian-only residency is not currently offered as a standard option; schools with that requirement must confirm fit before relying on Bell Path

Public product and pricing pages state that school data is hosted in Australia

Human support

Direct email and walkthrough requests, with the product designed for the school team to run itself

Publicly offers a dedicated account manager, business-hours phone and priority email, plus one-to-one setup and training

FAQ

Questions schools ask when comparing Bell Path and DayGrid.

  • Are Bell Path and DayGrid direct competitors?

    They overlap directly on Australian primary-school specialist timetabling and yard-duty rostering. The clearest split is outside that overlap: DayGrid adds class creation, while Bell Path extends the timetable into daily cover, wet-day, event, operations, Education Support, and staff-review workflows.

  • Which option fits a school that requires Australian data hosting?

    Based on current public positioning, DayGrid is the clearer fit for a school with a strict Australian-hosting requirement. Bell Path does not currently offer Australian-only residency as a standard option and says schools must confirm that requirement before relying on the service.

  • Does Bell Path have a free trial like DayGrid?

    No. Bell Path lets a school explore the public sample and enter its setup before purchase, but payment is required before the first timetable generation. DayGrid publicly offers free platform access with limited capacity. Schools should compare the exact point at which each option proves the part they care about.

  • Why compare Bell Path with DayGrid now?

    DayGrid now appears for the same Australian primary-school planning searches and speaks to the same timetable and yard-duty buyer. A candid comparison helps schools decide whether class creation, connected daily operations, data residency, or support style should drive the shortlist.

Ready when you are

Publish a timetable you can trust.

Bell Path helps assistant principals and principals move from spreadsheet stress to a calmer, fairer, more explainable planning workflow.

Tell us what you want to see and a preferred after-school time. We will confirm by email.

Bell Path vs DayGrid | Australian Primary School Software